Points of Contention
by: tombradyquinn
A Salute to Sincerity (NGS II First Assignment)
May 25, 2006 | 6:55PM | report this

            Do professional athletes play for the love of the game, or is it all just about the money?

            This question is the subject of a continuous and timeless debate in the sports world about the sincerity of the athletic endeavors of not only the most highly paid professionals, but also the average and more mediocre players.

Putting aside whether or not these athletes actually deserve the amount of money they make, one facet that remains largely unexplored is this question: How many veteran professional athletes actually still enjoy what they're doing?  Studies suggest most Americans don't necessarily enjoy what they do for a living. Who knows how many athletes feel that way? 

If one does not truly enjoy one's work, is there any shame in simply walking away to pursue something else in life?  Veteran athletes, unlike many of us, have a unique ability to do this because of the large amounts of money they have already made, yet great players are often ridiculed, smeared, and even stigmatized for retiring while still in their prime.  Today, I will comment on the early and often scorned retirement of Barry Sanders from the NFL, and explain why his action was really a noble, sincere, and self preserving choice.

            As we have seen in the past from athletes such as Barry Sanders and Jim Brown, who both retired in their prime, as well as from athletes such as Michael Jordan and Roger Clemens, who both retired (or will retire) multiple times after long careers, it takes a lot of courage for a person to walk away from a game he or she loves.  However, it takes the most courage to walk away in one's prime, as Sanders and Brown both did.  Both were true to themselves and who they were; neither was getting the same enjoyment from playing football that made him become a professional football player to begin with, for whatever reason. 

Yet people still ask why: Why did Barry Sanders retire one season short of breaking the all-time rushing record?  Why did Jim Brown, who was arguably better than any running back who came before him, just suddenly decide that he no longer wanted to play professional football?  They must not have loved the game anymore.  Barry Sanders must have been just playing for the money.

            To draw such conclusions is to ignore an essential paradox: Barry Sanders retired from football because he loved football.  That's right.  It wasn't just about contracts, losing teams, bad coaching, or incompetent front office executives.  Yes, those things certainly made football less enjoyable for Barry, but in the end, I contend he retired to preserve his love for the game.

            After 10 seasons with Detroit, Sanders had done just about everything a running back can do in a career, short of winning the Super Bowl and claiming the all-time rushing title.  He led the NFL in rushing four times, rushed for over 1500 yards in a season an NFL-record 5 times, and rushed for over 100 yards in the final 14 games of 1997 (another NFL record), becoming only the third player in NFL history to reach 2000 rushing yards in a season.

            But off the field, a tumultuous storm was swirling for Barry.  Although they selected Sanders with the third pick in the 1989 NFL draft, the Lions had failed for nearly a decade to build a Super Bowl caliber team around him.  In spite of this, the front office and even the coaching staff still expected him to carry the team on his back every Sunday and, along with the local media, seemed to generally blame him (besides the quarterback Rodney Peete or later Scott Mitchell) when things weren't going well.  Like any great player in that stage of his career who had never won a championship might do, Sanders inquired after the 1998 season about being traded to another team, an offer which was subsequently refused and even ridiculed by the Lions brass.

            Yes, the Lions had signed Barry Sanders two years before to a $35 million 6-year contract extension with an $11 million signing bonus, a veritable franchise player tag.  Such an extension should have reflected a commitment from the front office to give their legendary running back the players his team needed to play deep into January.  However, this was not happening as of 1998 in Detroit; on the contrary, the Lions were actually getting worse.

            Not being granted a release from his contract or consulted about any type of trade, Barry began to feel the effects of being constantly underappreciated by grumbling fans and media.  The tide of popular opinion began to turn against the Lions running back as his team's front office waged a public relations war against him.  There was no way Barry Sanders could enjoy playing the game he loved in such an environment.  He was faced with a life-changing decision: Walk away because he could no longer enjoy doing what he loved, or keep playing for the money.  Eventually, he announced his retirement on July 28, 1999.

            This is where things come full circle.  To play without enjoyment is to play only for the money, and thus to risk compromising one's passion for the sport.  Barry Sanders did the right thing for himself; he did not want to lose his love of football by resentfully going through the motions without enthusiasm or passion. Ask any NFL player why he first loved football, and the answer will probably be something like: "Because it was fun."  For most, it is still fun.  But if that ever changes, a player must reassess the sincerity of his motives, and whether or not he wants things to really be all about the money.  

It is anyone's guess how many professional athletes-famous, average, or mediocre-no longer draw satisfaction from their work.  However, one certainty is that despite any possible public resentment or ridicule, it is truly courageous and sincere for a famous athlete to admit in the midst of his prime that he no longer wishes to play his sport professionally.  As for the reasons, such decisions are personal, and should remain personal unless disclosed by the individual who harbors them. 

Since the average veteran athlete has already made a great deal of money in his career at a young age, he has the opportunity to retire and do something else if he so chooses.  If a player is in a situation where he can no longer draw enjoyment from the sport he plays, why should he be criticized for exercising this advantage that most people do not have?

            After all, with the amount of money NFL tickets cost and the amount of time it takes to build a winning team, nobody wants to cheer for players on their favorite team who don't even want to be there.

 

24 Comments | Add a comment   categories: NGS II, Next Great Sportswriter, NFL, Barry Sanders, Detroit Lions, NFL Draft
 
« Continue reading Points of Contention
total comments: 24      Page 1 of 1     
tjw118
May 25, 2006
7:06 PM
Nice post. Ironic though, I too picked a fellow Lion and discussed the problem pro athletes face: when to walk away. Very good read!

edhardiman
May 25, 2006
7:21 PM
Nice job, well done, walking away in his prime was gutsy, I always wonder what Brown or Sanders would tell you privately about the decision and/or subsequent regrets.

letsgoredwings
May 25, 2006
8:59 PM
this post was a good read, but the margins and indentations are way to wide. Hope yoy have another shot.

MeanDovine
May 25, 2006
9:03 PM
TBQ,

You've done a reputable job here, but not stellar. I feel bad because I am familiar with the particulars of Barry's situation, so I found myself hoping for some new information. Thus, here is where a piece like this could have benefited tremendously from a personal quote from Barry Sanders, or someone else familiar with the situation. Heck, a quote from any athlete who walked away from the game in his prime would have helped your piece immensely.

Please, I know that such a wish is beyond the scope of what you could possibly bring to the piece. But, as you admit yourself, this issue has been so widely covered. Also, Barry now openly talks about why he left the game, so I feel like the piece should have at least had a quote from him, even if it came via research from a third-party sports' publication.

In this regard, I'm offering a compliment as opposed to a criticism, as the piece had the feel of a perspective I'd likely read in a major print publication. All that's missing is the personal interview.

Really good job.

Last edited by MeanDovine on May 25th at 9:07 PM.

bafongu
May 26, 2006
7:19 AM
"I quit because I didn't feel like the Detroit Lions had a chance to win. It just killed my enjoyment of the game." Barry Sanders

tombradyquinn
May 26, 2006
10:08 AM
MeanDovine: thanks for your comments. I appreciate the feedback.
While the Barry Sanders situation has been widely covered, I mentioned that athletes' loss of enjoyment is "... one facet (of sports) that remains largely unexplored." It's hard to believe that can happen to somebody who has a dream job. I use Barry's situation to show why it's OK for a great player to do what he did. It's kind of an op-ed piece, so the focus was more on ideas, but I do see your point.
I'm glad you liked it.

bafongu: thanks for reading and for posting the quote. BTW, great picture

Last edited by tombradyquinn on May 26th at 10:11 AM.

DMitch87
May 26, 2006
12:36 PM
Here's my two cents:

Good piece. Good topic. It's widely covered but still a mysterious subject and always worth talking about.

However, I don't really think the way you wrote the story was overly stellar. In writing an article, you should have a maximum of 27 words for your lede to draw in your reader. If it's longer than 27 words, you've already lost the readers attention. It was in your fourth paragraph and 189th word that I finally found out what your piece was about. I think you need to move the thing about Barry Sanders straight up into your lede and then describe the situation from there.

Also, the saying: "Today I will comment on the early and scorned retirement..." seems more like a contention in a debate than an editorial piece. The reader knows that you will comment on it, so it isn't necessary to point that out to them.

Overall, a decent article, but after reading some of your other stuff, I definitely think you have a lot more in you. I hope to see you move on so that I can read more from you.

xrooster
May 26, 2006
1:06 PM
yea free writing lessons from a contributor to an award winning GA periodical.

PRICELESS

shout out to Ricky Williams.

tombradyquinn
May 26, 2006
1:26 PM
DMitch: thanks for the feedback and for reading my piece.
Those are two very valid points. I could have introduced Barry sooner, though I did introduce the larger issues of the piece right away.
As for stating what I intended to show, I was trying to justify early retirement by using Barry Sanders as an example, so it was a sort of argument (my blog is, after all, named Points of Contention). You do make an interesting point. I could probably have phrased that part a little differently.
I'm glad you thought it was good.

Last edited by tombradyquinn on May 26th at 1:37 PM.

DMitch87
May 26, 2006
1:33 PM
Haha...well I didn't even realize that was the name of your blog. Go figure.

SportsUniverse
May 26, 2006
2:25 PM
Petty decent post, you might have mentioned, he recieved death threats also as he closed in on Walter Paytons record. Just advice. I've always wondered if something other than, he didn't think his team could compete could be the reasoning for retirement. It's a shame he didn't get the last 5 or 6 years of his career.

whathappnd
May 26, 2006
2:54 PM
TBQ: Interesting topic choice, in that you are correct in saying the real reason for why an athlete leaves a sport during their prime isn't always clear and, in fact, is a mystery.

But may I add some constructive criticism here? 4 paragraphs to get to the subject, with no real build-up of suspense, makes this to be a long read. I also personally wouldn't have said "Today I will comment on Barry Sanders, etc."- for me, it takes away much of the credibility of the piece. It somehow revealed to me a lack of maturity in your writing, but hey, that's just one girls opinion.

I agree with others in that there was no new information added to this piece, and that a quote from someone regarding your topic would have benefitted your article greatly. Without it, it just seems to be rehashing old news.

A better piece than others you have written overall, but on the whole, it lacked that certain je ne s'ais quoi to really draw your reader in and the ability to connect.

Overall grade: B-

tombradyquinn
May 26, 2006
3:14 PM
whathappnd: thanks for reading the piece, and thanks for the feedback.
It's possible that the sentence you mention is not entirely necessary. It could be altered (even though I am building a case here and it's good to let the reader know what I intend to prove).

About the subject, it took me a few paragraphs to mention Barry Sanders because the piece is about something more than just him. He is the example I use to argue that a great athlete should not be criticized for retiring young.

About the lack of new information, this was meant to be mostly an opinion piece. My intent really wasn't to report new facts or statistics, but rather to explore ideas and points of view. Still, those are valid points.
Thanks again for the feedback.

Last edited by tombradyquinn on May 26th at 3:55 PM.

MavPilla
May 26, 2006
4:16 PM
what happnd not trying to reiterate what she's said but I once again concur -- I think it took too long to get to the point and when you got to the point I didn't find the illumination or personal touch there -- I thought it was kind of a conjecture piece that could've used more concrete substance --
tbq -- you have a good writing style just put us more into this story without sounding like a thesis -- more description

keep at it brady!

patmoran2006
May 26, 2006
4:20 PM
Im going to be honest with you, there are TWO things that really turned me off to your article, and it has nothing to do with the message you said in it.

1- When you're writing a 750-850 word piece on a specific person, why would you wait til the very end of paragraph four to enlighten your readers as to who the person is? That's much too long a lead in.

2- This is even more bothersome.. If I wasn't so lazy I'd count, but you said Barry Sanders at least 8-9 times throughout the article. For future reference, you can say Barry Sanders the first time and after that simply use his last name... You dont have to say Barry Sanders every time you mention him.. By the second time we all know who you're talking about.

Sorry if that comes off as critical but this is a competition.

Last edited by patmoran2006 on May 26th at 4:38 PM.

tombradyquinn
May 26, 2006
4:49 PM
MavPilla: thanks for the encouragement. I'll keep in mind what you said.

pat: I appreciate the feedback and thank you for reading the article.
The message made the piece, Barry made the example. The piece was about him in the sense of how he applied to the larger point I was trying to make about how a great athlete should not be criticized for retiring young, an issue introduced immediately.
I probably should have just said "Sanders" more often, but I used his full name far less than I could have.


Last edited by tombradyquinn on May 26th at 4:52 PM.

edclinchsaint
May 27, 2006
11:09 AM
Comments: Good, solid post.
1) Being a RB is not easy. You get beat up.
Ralph Wiley, DT (with the Chargers), wrote in the LA times his four year old niece made him scream with pain (and scared her) by squeezing his fingers once. This is not a fun sport or job if you are not gratified by all the sacrifices...

2) A kicker named Pulsipher, former friend, signed by the Lions, tells a classic story about Barry buying a "new" car. Visit my blog and ask me if you wish to hear it...

3) Maybe Barry loved Walter as much as many others do? They don't call him Sweetness for nothing.

4. Interesting piece, keep going.

Bloggerino

edclinch
May 28, 2006
3:52 AM
My friend Pulsipher (we met in 1999, Highland, CA) was a kicker signed by the Lions in 1997. (He blew out his knee on a quirk gopher hole on the field and applied to dental schools thereafter...)

In training camp, 1997, Barry comes into the locker room and announces he had bought a new car.

Some brashy receiver, maybe a UCLA grad, a famous guy with a name like Morton or some such thing, a LOUD talker (understood--brashy) says, "Hey, let's go check it out!"

They go out to the parking lot, and there is a used Lamborghini, circa 1992 or so. Barry brags how he got it for "only 4-8 thousand" (something minor to NFL budgets, sorry my memory isn't perfect here) and Morton (or whatever his name is) says, "That ain't no new car, cuz!"

And Barry Sanders, perhaps the best of all time, says,
"Well, it's new to me."

Nice, huh? I like Sanders a lot.

One of my personal favorites. Shame I can't remember the specifics better.
That's how rumors get started!

Peace co-bloggerite!

edclinch
May 28, 2006
4:18 AM
Setting the record straight (for my memory lapses):

1.Did I say Ralph Wiley? I meant Marcellus Wiley, who I believe played at Columbia, Ivy League!
Was playing with the Chargers, maybe still...
Ralph might be a writer somewhere...

2. Dan Pulsipher was an All-American kicker for the U. of Utah. Six feet tall, tremendous leg strength. He dunked in our pick up games. His dad practiced dentistry and he said the day he got accepted to Loma Linda D.S., a half dozen NFL teams called. He had turned the page, to a "safer" profession.

3. Could the bling-bling dude have been Johnnie?
Not sure, we need a sports forensics expert on this one...

4. Maybe the car cost 5,000 smackers. Not much.

5. My high school Spanish classes heard this story from Dan himself. He was kind enough to talk to them in his free time (bilingual, served a mission in Taiwan like Chad Lewis).

6. Ok, Happy Sunday. I need to shave and go to church. Happy Memorial Day weekend.

7. Remember the fallen for freedom...

edhardiman
May 29, 2006
9:48 AM
Best of luck with the judging today TBQ.

canyondave
May 29, 2006
1:26 PM
TBQ-I just want to say that this was the first time I checked out your site and I enjoyed the piece. Sanders was always a favorite player of mine and I felt for his situation with the Lions.I also must express my dismay at all of the writing"experts" who have come out of the woodwork and who feel the need to constantly critique and criticize. I did not enter the contest because of time restraints and personal circumstances would not allow me to be truly competitive. However, I must admit I had thoughts after seeing the Sweet 16 of " well maybe I should have". But after continually reading the critical comments of fellow bloggers who are NOT the judges and who feel the need to show they are above the rest of us in talent and skill, I have become completely disenfranchised with it all. I am glad I did not enter. But I wish all of you who have moved on luck and success. I feel luck will have alot to do with it because I disagreed with many of the judges assessments of the week 1 assignments for you guys. A blog should not feel like a job with a preasuring boss and condencending co-workers. I liked what you wrote, the subject, content, and language. Carry On! And I will drop in more often.

edclinch
May 29, 2006
2:29 PM
Hey, I just got the results.
Congrats and sorry for the elimination.
You beat out a lot of good bloggers to get this far, and you should be proud.

I have enjoyed your blogs and ideas and I hope you continue on a successful path...

I am a religious guy and I always have relied on a higher power to get me through tough times, and I hope this isn't one for you! You really have accomplished something significant and I think you have scored a moral victory, which in the long term pays superb dividends when put in the proper perspective.

I left some similar words (not exactly) on Absolute Best's last post...

Good luck, God bless and may we continue to care and participate about the most important things in life---and sports!

Bloggenendrum Floralia

Dudski
May 29, 2006
5:13 PM
Hey Tom, good job on the post. As you keep doing this, which you should, you'll get comments good and bad and that's all the contest thing is really, just one more comment. Have fun with it and keep on going. Going out in the first or last round is still going out and there are 11 more of us waiting to join you in the near future. I'll keep reading if you keep writing.

edhardiman
May 29, 2006
6:25 PM
TBQ, I'm sorry you didn't make the 12 and wish you the very best of luck in your future endeavors. I think it was a great piece of scribble and hope you continue to put out good work.

Page 1 of 1     
Add a comment  
ABOUT ME


tombradyquinn
My name is Al, and I am a purist with an East Coast bias. I'm a rarity among fans, because although I have lived in a city with teams my whole life, I have no hometown loyalties. All of my favorite teams are from out of state, and they are teams I have followed intensely since I was very young. I like the Steelers and the Giants in football, the Reds and Mets in baseball, the Knicks in basketball, the Bruins in hockey, and several college teams including Notre Dame, Gonzaga, Tennessee, Xavier, Creighton, St. Joseph's, St. John's, Marshall, Indiana, and North Carolina. I've been a Gonzaga fan since before they were an NCAA tourney Cinderella, and every year I stay up to watch them play on the West Coast when they're on.
MY FAVORITE BLOGS
The Official FOXSports Blog
Time stamping is done in Pacific Time.